If you’ve ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they’re actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they’re not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.

The of the FCC’s Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC’s Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. what is a safe distance from a cell tower ‘s usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. postheaven.net/beardactor3/how-far-should-i-keep-from-your-5g-mobile-phone-tower can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.

The FCC’s Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you’ve probably realized that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body’s outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.

The FCC’s Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC’s Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn’t be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.